Everything
php
Learn Community Releases The PHP Project
Home » Project » Newsgroups » php.internals » [RFC] [Voting] Class Naming »

[RFC] [Voting] Class Naming

php.internals

Fleshgrinder

9 years ago
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming Voting starts now and will be open for two weeks (July 15).
-- Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger

Pieter Hordijk

9 years ago
----- Original Message -----
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming > > Voting starts now and will be open for two weeks (July 15). > > -- > Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
https://wiki.php.net/rfc still says no RFCs are in voting.

Fleshgrinder

9 years ago
On 7/1/2017 9:13 PM, Pieter Hordijk wrote:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc still says no RFCs are in voting. > >
Thanks, fixed.
-- Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger

Fleshgrinder

9 years ago
On 7/1/2017 7:42 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming > > Voting starts now and will be open for two weeks (July 15). >
Just to clarify something that came up: Voting "no" on the first poll means that we are not going to define a rule for class naming. Hence, voting "no" on the first poll and yes on anything in the second has no effect! This is how all multi-polls so far worked and this one is no exception.
-- Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger

Christoph Becker

9 years ago
On 04.07.2017 at 18:44, schrieb Fleshgrinder wrote:
> On 7/1/2017 7:42 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote: >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming >> >> Voting starts now and will be open for two weeks (July 15). >> > > Just to clarify something that came up: > > Voting "no" on the first poll means that we are not going to define a > rule for class naming. Hence, voting "no" on the first poll and yes on > anything in the second has no effect! > > This is how all multi-polls so far worked and this one is no exception.
Hmm, one might dislike having the coding standards amended in this regard, but still may have a preference on how it would be changed, if the change will be accepted.
-- Christoph M. Becker

Fleshgrinder

9 years ago
On 7/4/2017 11:24 PM, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> Hmm, one might dislike having the coding standards amended in this > regard, but still may have a preference on how it would be changed, if > the change will be accepted. >
Haven't thought about it this way, that actually makes sense. What I want to avoid is that anybody thinks that the second poll has any meaning if the first one is a "no". In that case the second one is "nothing". That is basically the point. A vote like you said definitely makes sense, yes.
-- Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger

Kalle Sommer Nielsen

9 years ago
2017-07-05 19:20 GMT+02:00 Fleshgrinder <php@fleshgrinder.com>:
> Haven't thought about it this way, that actually makes sense. > > What I want to avoid is that anybody thinks that the second poll has any > meaning if the first one is a "no". In that case the second one is > "nothing". That is basically the point. A vote like you said definitely > makes sense, yes.
That's how I always interpreted our voting process for multi polls like this one
-- regards, Kalle Sommer Nielsen kalle@php.net

Nikita Popov

9 years ago
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Fleshgrinder <php@fleshgrinder.com> wrote:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming > > Voting starts now and will be open for two weeks (July 15). >
As it's already July 18, I've closed the vote. The RFC has been accepted (17:9) and the option "PascalCase except Acronyms" received more votes (15:11). Nikita