Everything

php

[PATCH] Three new GD functions

php.internals

John Coggeshall

23 years ago

I've ported three GD functions from the 2.0.12 version of GD into the
bundled version: imagesetclip(), imagegetclip(), and
imagecopyrotated()... I may go through and port more but I wanted to see
the response to this before I wasted more time...

You can find all you need at
http://www.coggeshall.org/php/gd_04042003.php


-~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~-
John Coggeshall
john at coggeshall dot org                  http://www.coggeshall.org/
-~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~-

Ilia A.

23 years ago

On April 4, 2003 01:11 pm, John Coggeshall wrote:

> I've ported three GD functions from the 2.0.12 version of GD into the
> bundled version: imagesetclip(), imagegetclip(), and
> imagecopyrotated()... I may go through and port more but I wanted to see
> the response to this before I wasted more time...

I'll look into them this weekend, when I will be working on porting fixes from
gd 2.0.12 into the bundled library.

Ilia

Pierre-Alain Joye

23 years ago

On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:11:04 -0500
"John Coggeshall" <john@coggeshall.org> wrote:

>
> I've ported three GD functions from the 2.0.12 version of GD into the
> bundled version: imagesetclip(), imagegetclip(), and
> imagecopyrotated()... I may go through and port more but I wanted to
> see the response to this before I wasted more time...

I can take care of imagecopyrotated using the actual imagerotate
function, which provides a better quality.

Do you agree?

pierre

John Coggeshall

23 years ago

I haven't done a comparison, but imagecopyrotated() isn't something I
made -- I ported it from the latest version of the GD library. If you
think you could make a better imagecopyrotated() I don't have a problem
with it, but I don't really see a great deal of need.

John


-~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~-
John Coggeshall
john at coggeshall dot org                  http://www.coggeshall.org/
-~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~-

Pierre-Alain Joye

23 years ago

On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:30:23 -0500
"John Coggeshall" <john@coggeshall.org> wrote:

>
> I haven't done a comparison, but imagecopyrotated() isn't something I
> made -- I ported it from the latest version of the GD library. If you
> think you could make a better imagecopyrotated() I don't have a
> problem with it, but I don't really see a great deal of need.

Neither I do :) I thought it was cleaner to use the current
gdImageRotate function instead of reimplement a brute force rotation
function. I was afraid of bogus report like "Why copyrotate does not
provide the same result as rotate?" ;-)

But from my point of view, I do not care about the current GD
itself, I will continue my job on php5 gd later in april, that makes
more sense to us, as we discussed it sometimes ago.

hth

pierre