how about: "break label;" ?
just a thought
>From: Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com>
>To: "Sara Golemon" <pollita@php.net>,internals@lists.php.net
>Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GOTO operator
>Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 00:13:51 -0700
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Sender: andi@127.0.0.1
>Received: from pb1.pair.com ([216.92.131.4]) by mc9-f26.hotmail.com with
>Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Sat, 31 Jul 2004 00:14:21 -0700
>Received: (qmail 21507 invoked by uid 1010); 31 Jul 2004 07:14:12 -0000
>Received: (qmail 21456 invoked by uid 1010); 31 Jul 2004 07:14:11 -0000
>X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEhitu4NH5K6pJRNQwoa+2D
>Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
>Precedence: bulk
>list-help: <mailto:internals-help@lists.php.net>
>list-unsubscribe: <mailto:internals-unsubscribe@lists.php.net>
>list-post: <mailto:internals@lists.php.net>
>Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
>Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
>Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
>Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040731001327.02821998@127.0.0.1>
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
>In-Reply-To: <20040731042517.4546.qmail@pb1.pair.com>
>References: <200407291830.55971.ilia@prohost.org>
><20040729021337.73894.qmail@pb1.pair.com>
><1091139076.29517.12.camel@blobule.suds> <410991E1.6070000@hristov.com>
><200407291830.55971.ilia@prohost.org>
><5.1.0.14.2.20040730114632.02bc89c8@127.0.0.1>
><5.1.0.14.2.20040730120146.02ec7ac8@127.0.0.1>
><5.1.0.14.2.20040730121624.02bc8880@127.0.0.1>
>Return-Path: internals-return-11756-xuefer=hotmail.com@lists.php.net
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2004 07:14:21.0331 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[00488630:01C476CE]
>
>At 09:24 PM 7/30/2004 -0700, Sara Golemon wrote:
>> > > > c) I don't think you are creating the necessary switch_free's and
>>other
>> > > > frees when jumping out of a scope unexpectedly.
>> > > >
>> > >Entirely possible. The tests I've run don't complain but that doesn't
>>mean
>> > >something bad isn't happening.
>> >
>>Thanks for the pointers, I at least see what I need to be exploring now
>>(though I havn't sat down to unfold its meaning yet). Cetainly the
>>implementation given earlier needs work whether its to make it work as
>>advertised or in the more limited fashion suggested in other posts.
>>
>>I intend to put some work into it regardless of whether it'll be included
>>or
>>not. As I mentioned originally, this entire effort was meant as a
>>learning
>>exercise, and it's doing that job. If it's used: great. If not, it'll
>>just
>>stay where it is and those who want it can still patch it in.
>
>Sara,
>
>Feel free to email me personally and I can help you out and give you advice
>on what you should be looking at.
>
>Andi
>
>--
>PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail