Greg Beaver wrote:
>> Was the removal of most pear package in 4.3.11 intentional?
>
> Yes.
>
Has this been announced somewhere? I did not see anything in ChangeLog
and release notes.
> The only other change being considered for the future would be to
> make it easier to install PEAR by providing a single file containing all
> resources, but this is still very much on the drawing board, and would
> not affect the packages ultimately installed.
If you have a shell-account and you are superuser, it is not difficult
to install pear/packages. If you are not superuser, it becomes more
difficult. But if you don't have a shell-account installation becomes
really hard. go-pear for web does not work 100%, same for web-installer.
Some people cannot use it at all, because it simply does not work. So
often your only option is to install pear/packages by uploading the
extracted php-files from your PC.
> The plan is to rely on users installing these packages. It was becoming
> increasingly difficult to maintain the bundles, and because older
> versions were often bundled, it introduced potential security risks as
> well.
One of the biggest problems of pear is, that most people simply cannot
use it! If I recommend people using pear-package XY, in 4 of 5 cases the
user could not use the package because it is not installed, and he has
no idea how to get it work. I know it is possible, but if you install it
the first time it could become really hard.
If you want to rely on users to install packages (which is a good idea
IMHO) all users (not only superusers) need a reliable tool for
installation/management (also without shell-account).
best regards
Andreas