On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Colin Tucker wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I know this issue has most likely been discussed to death here so I apologise
> in advance for starting a new thread about it. I just need to get my head
> around the reasoning for introducing this change to PHP4 (4.4 branch). I can
> understand making the change to PHP5, but can someone bring me up to speed as
> to why it was done to PHP4? As I'm sure you're aware, it breaks heaps and
> heaps of existing code out there.
It already broke heaps of code - and this problems *was* affecting
application with hard to find crashes. So yes, it is worth it.
> We found this out the hard way yesterday when our server administrator
> upgraded our production server to PHP 4.4.0 (even though the Debian package
> description said it was a PHP 4.3.x release). We ended up with hundreds of
> errors and many, many vhosts stopped working correctly due to "variable
> references should be returned by reference" problems, both in my code and in
> third-party code, such as PHPBB instances.
Uhm, they're only notices - they shouldn't show up at the website in
production, now should they?
> And now I read that this will not be "fixed" in future PHP4 releases due to
> breaking backwards compatibility? I just don't understand... a change that
> breaks backwards compatibility in a large portion of the existing PHP4 code
> base will not be fixed because it breaks backwards compatibility? It's doing
> my head in, please can someone explain?
PHP 4 is not going to change the behavior anymore.
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org