On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> I just noticed that the DATE_ISO8601 constant and the "c" date()
> character don't give the same results.
> The difference is that the "c" format prints colon in the timezone
> offset, but the constant does not - both are however ISO8601
> compliant.
<snip>
> However! I think ISO8601 formats without the colon are more used..,
> not sure if this should be changed at all....
Indeed, I don't think we should change this. As long as it is properly
documented of course.
regards,
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org