Ah. I see the difference. I'm expecting overloading. Hmmm. Even with
that though, overloading is the desired effect.
On 21/07/06, Soenke Ruempler <ruempler@topconcepts.com> wrote:
> Richard Quadling <mailto:rquadling@googlemail.com> wrote on Friday, July
> 21, 2006 12:28 PM:
>
> > Shouldn't be necessary. As there are 2 different methods, they should
> > be allowed different parameter signatures. If you want to extend a
> > method but hide original implementation, you can't change the
> > parameter signature. I'm on the opposite side of the fence to you it
> > seems!
>
> But that's not the nature of polymorphism and the predictness and
> consistency of an API. For example - think of object aggregation:
>
> public function setBlub(A $a) {
> $this->_a = $a;
> }
>
> Now because of my consistent API of class A and all derived classes I
> exactly know the methods and parameters, even if B (as child class of A)
> is passed to "setBlub()".
>
> So maybe from your POV it's two different methods (and yes, it IS
> *technically*). But from OOP and API design view it is polymorphism and
> consistency, if I didn't failed all OOP lessons and design pattern books
> ;)
>
> -soenke
>
--
-----
Richard Quadling
Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731
"Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"