Release php-5.2.0RC6

php.internals

Edin Kadribasic

19 years ago
Now that we know that there is going to be RC6 I think there is no point in waiting for another week for it just because we have to release things on Thursday. I think that the best thing would be to make immediate RC6 and allow people some time to test it, and if nothing critical comes up, release the final version in a week or so. Edin

Ilia A.

19 years ago
RC6 will be out on Thursday to give people a chance to identify any remaining issues with the current state of 5.2.0 as well as allow existing bug reporters to confirm the critical issues outlined have been resolved. On 6-Oct-06, at 7:13 PM, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> Now that we know that there is going to be RC6 I think there is no > point in waiting for another week for it just because we have to > release things on Thursday. > > I think that the best thing would be to make immediate RC6 and > allow people some time to test it, and if nothing critical comes > up, release the final version in a week or so. > > Edin >
Ilia Alshanetsky

Edin Kadribasic

19 years ago
I believe that making a RC now will increase the probability of people testing out stuff, rather than expecting them to checkout the latest CVS. I see absolutely no point in waiting to some arbitrary weekday. Edin Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:

Ilia A.

19 years ago
On 6-Oct-06, at 7:25 PM, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> I believe that making a RC now will increase the probability of > people testing out stuff, rather than expecting them to checkout > the latest CVS. I see absolutely no point in waiting to some > arbitrary weekday.
Aside from a few issues RC5 is identical to RC6 for testing purposes it is good enough to allow people to identify major faults. As far as latest CVS is concerned, there is no need to checkout CVS due to a wonderful thing called snapshots, which you can usually find at http://snaps.php.net/. Ilia Alshanetsky

Hannes Magnusson

19 years ago
On 10/7/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <ilia@prohost.org> wrote:
> RC6 will be out on Thursday to give people a chance to identify any > remaining issues with the current state of 5.2.0 as well as allow > existing bug reporters to confirm the critical issues outlined have > been resolved.
If you are referring to bug #39060 then I here by confirm that the bug outlined in the _report_ is fixed. I doubt however the realpath() bug in ZTS on BSD will ever be fixed. -Hannes

Rasmus Lerdorf

19 years ago
Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> Now that we know that there is going to be RC6 I think there is no point > in waiting for another week for it just because we have to release > things on Thursday. > > I think that the best thing would be to make immediate RC6 and allow > people some time to test it, and if nothing critical comes up, release > the final version in a week or so.
Many people haven't had a chance to look at RC5 yet. I think cycling through them too fast is going to frustrate people. Give them a couple of days to report other issues before going to RC6. -Rasmus

Edin Kadribasic

19 years ago
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Edin Kadribasic wrote: >> Now that we know that there is going to be RC6 I think there is no >> point in waiting for another week for it just because we have to >> release things on Thursday. >> >> I think that the best thing would be to make immediate RC6 and allow >> people some time to test it, and if nothing critical comes up, release >> the final version in a week or so. > > Many people haven't had a chance to look at RC5 yet. I think cycling > through them too fast is going to frustrate people. Give them a couple > of days to report other issues before going to RC6.
Having to wait a week while there is another RC and allowing commits in the meanwhile, any of which can break things, is not the best release management from my perspective. Edin

Antony Dovgal

19 years ago
On 10/08/2006 04:26 AM, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >> Edin Kadribasic wrote: >>> Now that we know that there is going to be RC6 I think there is no >>> point in waiting for another week for it just because we have to >>> release things on Thursday. >>> >>> I think that the best thing would be to make immediate RC6 and allow >>> people some time to test it, and if nothing critical comes up, release >>> the final version in a week or so. >> >> Many people haven't had a chance to look at RC5 yet. I think cycling >> through them too fast is going to frustrate people. Give them a couple >> of days to report other issues before going to RC6. > > Having to wait a week while there is another RC and allowing commits in > the meanwhile, any of which can break things, is not the best release > management from my perspective.
I tend to disagree with you here, Edin. Releasing one RC just after another - _that_ would be bad management. RCs are RCs, if something is broken in one of them, let's wait for the next one and see if it ok. Also, I don't like the rush in the release management which to appears from time to time, but this time (I mean 5.2) something (or someone) has changed and I really like how it goes, so let's make it as stable as we can and push it out of the door without any hurry.
-- Wbr, Antony Dovgal

Edin Kadribasic

19 years ago
Antony Dovgal wrote:
> I tend to disagree with you here, Edin. > Releasing one RC just after another - _that_ would be bad management. > RCs are RCs, if something is broken in one of them, let's wait for the > next one and see if it ok. > > Also, I don't like the rush in the release management which to appears > from time to time, but this time (I mean 5.2) something (or someone) has > changed and I really like how it goes, so let's make it as stable as we > can and push it out of the door without any hurry.
I believe that there is very little sense in making release candidates and continue on committing patches, and in case of PHP major feature changes while in the release process. I guess changes to the code should be kept to minimum and reserved for critical bug fixes. Otherwise there is no telling what broke since the last release candidate and they become pointless. Edin