Bugzilla category for test case bugs?

php.internals

Zoe Slattery

19 years ago
Hi all Would it be possible to have a Bugzilla category for test case bugs? The only alternative seems to be to raise a bug against the implementation - which doesn't seem quite right. Zoe Slattery IBM

Pierre Joye

19 years ago
On 6/5/07, Zoe Slattery <zoe.slattery@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all > Would it be possible to have a Bugzilla category for test case bugs? > The only alternative seems to be to raise a bug against the > implementation - which doesn't seem quite right.
Why not simply put them in the related category? For example GD for a problem in a GD test. With an extra category, I will simply not see any bugs related to my extension tests, even when I'm fetching the 'GD' category bugs. What would rock is a bug "type" field. A bug can be GD and Testing related, or Ming and Documentation. --Pierre

Zoe Slattery

19 years ago
Pierre wrote:
> On 6/5/07, Zoe Slattery <zoe.slattery@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all >> Would it be possible to have a Bugzilla category for test case bugs? >> The only alternative seems to be to raise a bug against the >> implementation - which doesn't seem quite right. > > Why not simply put them in the related category? For example GD for a > problem in a GD test. With an extra category, I will simply not see > any bugs related to my extension tests, even when I'm fetching the > 'GD' category bugs.
That's reasonable. The reason that I asked was that all I'm doing is writing functional tests - so, for example - if I make a mistake in a functional test for "Filesystem" I don't necessarily see why the developer working on Filesystem should have to look at it, or spend their time fixing it. By the way, this came up because a colleague found a mistake in a test and couldn't work out the right way to raise a defect. I also noticed that there are separate categories for Documentation defects - so it seemed to me to be consistent to have one for tests. I'm happy to ask people to with raise them against the implementation - I just didn't want to cause unecessary work for the core developers. Of course I'm *hoping* that there won't be enough defects in the test cases to cause anyone major headaches :-)