Re: SOAP?

php.internals

Shane Caraveo

23 years ago
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> With all this new fancy XML support in PHP 5 -- what about SOAP?
I plan on implementing a new soap library based on top of simplexml, but will not be able to start serious work on it until august. The new library would be usable with almost no PHP code, but will still have supporting functionality written in PHP. I would say the new library would be at least 80% smaller, most code being to support addon functionality and different transports. Shane

Sebastian Bergmann

23 years ago
Shane Caraveo wrote:
> I plan on implementing a new soap library based on top of simplexml
Good news!
-- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ http://www.professionelle-softwareentwicklung-mit-php5.de/

Jeraimee Hughes

23 years ago
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:03:49AM -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote:
> Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > > With all this new fancy XML support in PHP 5 -- what about SOAP? > I plan on implementing a new soap library based on top of simplexml, but > will not be able to start serious work on it until august. The new > library would be usable with almost no PHP code, but will still have > supporting functionality written in PHP. I would say the new library > would be at least 80% smaller, most code being to support addon > functionality and different transports.
How's this going to interact (if any) with the supposed SOAP module already in PECL? (I was just about to start looking at it for some extension and use)
-- Jeraimee

Brad LaFountain

23 years ago
Shane doesn't like to play with the PECL one ;) (seems like nor do I, its been a while) - Brad --- Jeraimee Hughes <jhughes@revelex.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:03:49AM -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote: > > Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > > > With all this new fancy XML support in PHP 5 -- what about SOAP? > > I plan on implementing a new soap library based on top of simplexml, but > > will not be able to start serious work on it until august. The new > > library would be usable with almost no PHP code, but will still have > > supporting functionality written in PHP. I would say the new library > > would be at least 80% smaller, most code being to support addon > > functionality and different transports. > > How's this going to interact (if any) with the supposed SOAP module > already in PECL? > > (I was just about to start looking at it for some extension and use) > > -- > Jeraimee > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com

Jeraimee Hughes

23 years ago
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:16:16PM -0700, Brad LaFountain wrote:
> Shane doesn't like to play with the PECL one ;) > (seems like nor do I, its been a while) > - Brad
Well since the extensions are now 'in' PECL, doesn't that mean the SOAP extension there could/would be the PHP SOAP extension? If that's the case, is there something wrong with it that we can fix for php5? Or is it a lost cause. (no long winded explainations needed since this isn't the pear list)
> --- Jeraimee Hughes <jhughes@revelex.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:03:49AM -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote: > > > Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > > > > With all this new fancy XML support in PHP 5 -- what about SOAP? > > > I plan on implementing a new soap library based on top of simplexml, but > > > will not be able to start serious work on it until august. The new > > > library would be usable with almost no PHP code, but will still have > > > supporting functionality written in PHP. I would say the new library > > > would be at least 80% smaller, most code being to support addon > > > functionality and different transports. > > > > How's this going to interact (if any) with the supposed SOAP module > > already in PECL? > > > > (I was just about to start looking at it for some extension and use)
-- Jeraimee